<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    <title>Legal Frame &amp; News Magazine &amp; : Articles</title>
    <link>https://legalframe.in/rss/category/articles</link>
    <description>Legal Frame &amp; News Magazine &amp; : Articles</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator></dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <item>
        <title>PIL in Bombay High Court Accuses Prada of Copying GI&amp;Protected Kolhapuri Chappal Design</title>
        <link>https://legalframe.in/prada-kolhapuri-chappal-pil-2025</link>
        <guid>https://legalframe.in/prada-kolhapuri-chappal-pil-2025</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[ Prada is being sued in India for using the GI-protected Kolhapuri chappal design in its luxury line without crediting or compensating local artisans. ]]></description>
        <enclosure url="http://legalframe.in/uploads/images/202507/image_870x580_68683afbe3c46.jpg" length="118362" type="image/jpeg"/>
        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 09:00:00 +0900</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Kazi Naseb</dc:creator>
        <media:keywords>kolhapuri chappal, Prada PIL, Prada Kolhapuri sandals, geographical indication India, traditional Indian footwear, Prada cultural appropriation, artisan rights India, Prada lawsuit India, Bombay High Court PIL, Kolhapuri GI tag, Prada fashion controversy, Milan Fashion Week 2026, Indian crafts protection</media:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Allahabad High Court Declines to Declare Shahi Idgah Mosque a Disputed Structure</title>
        <link>https://legalframe.in/Krishna-Janmabhoomi---Shahi-Eidgah-Case</link>
        <guid>https://legalframe.in/Krishna-Janmabhoomi---Shahi-Eidgah-Case</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[ The Allahabad High Court upheld the legal status of the Shahi Idgah mosque in Mathura, rejecting a plea to label it a disputed structure. The court stressed the need for solid evidence in religious site claims. 18 related cases and ASI surveys are ongoing. ]]></description>
        <enclosure url="http://legalframe.in/uploads/images/202507/image_870x580_6867fa4534e5b.jpg" length="99922" type="image/jpeg"/>
        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 09:00:00 +0900</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Kazi Naseb</dc:creator>
        <media:keywords>Allahabad High Court, Shahi Idgah Mosque, Mathura dispute, disputed structure, Krishna Janmabhoomi, mosque-temple conflict, ASI survey, religious site status, Indian court ruling, heritage dispute, temple mosque case, Shahi Idgah verdict, July 4 2025 court ruling, Mayank Kumar Jain</media:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Not Just About the CJI: Justice Gavai’s Full Court Stand Rekindles Debate Over AMU Bench Referral</title>
        <link>https://legalframe.in/not-just-about-the-cji-justice-gavais-full-court-stand-rekindles-debate-over-amu-bench-referral</link>
        <guid>https://legalframe.in/not-just-about-the-cji-justice-gavais-full-court-stand-rekindles-debate-over-amu-bench-referral</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[  ]]></description>
        <enclosure url="http://legalframe.in/uploads/images/202507/image_870x580_686d2a9948f97.jpg" length="91604" type="image/jpeg"/>
        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 09:00:00 +0900</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Adv Ganesh Gadhe</dc:creator>
        <media:keywords></media:keywords>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>